Farrah v. Farrah
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtAumentado, J.
This appeal questions the propriety of the trial court’s finding that the plaintiffs did not hold a beneficial interest by way of a resulting trust in residential property owned by the defendants. The plaintiffs, husband and wife, sought a temporary and permanent injunction enjoining the defendants, the brother and sister of George H. Farrah (hereinafter Farrah), from proceeding with their summary process action against the plaintiffs, and sought a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs are the beneficial owners of residential property located at 250 Kenyon Street in Hartford.
The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cohen v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Zack v. GuzauskasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Fox v. ShanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Whitney v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Saradjian v. SaradjianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Spatola v. SpatolaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Denby v. Commissioner, Department of Income MaintenanceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Schmaling v. SchmalingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Belford v. Cantavero (In Re Bassett)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.