Legal Opinion

Farrah v. Farrah

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 6, 1982PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAumentado, J.

This appeal questions the propriety of the trial court’s finding that the plaintiffs did not hold a beneficial interest by way of a resulting trust in residential property owned by the defendants. The plaintiffs, husband and wife, sought a temporary and permanent injunction enjoining the defendants, the brother and sister of George H. Farrah (hereinafter Farrah), from proceeding with their summary process action against the plaintiffs, and sought a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs are the beneficial owners of residential property located at 250 Kenyon Street in Hartford.

The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cohen v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  3. Zack v. GuzauskasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Fox v. ShanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. Whitney v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Saradjian v. SaradjianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  2. Spatola v. SpatolaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Denby v. Commissioner, Department of Income MaintenanceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  4. Schmaling v. SchmalingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. Belford v. Cantavero (In Re Bassett)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API