Legal Opinion
United States v. Gifford
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 22, 1988No. 87-00258-23, 87-00258-24PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
O’NEILL, District Judge.
Defendants Gifford and Kelly 1 have moved to preclude the introduction of videotape depositions taken in Belgium. On September 23, 1987, I authorized the government’s taking of pre-trial depositions of Abdelkader Azaglou, Leon Desmet, Mr. and Mrs. Michael Kautsky, Jean Paul Micheils, Franciscus Moens, Pierre Nocent, M. Picavet, M. Van Den Berg, and M. Van Den Meersch. Order of September 23, 1987, United States v. Scarfo, et al., No. 87-258. Defendants object to the admissibility of these depositions on two bases: the confrontation clause and Rule 804(a) of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Vidal Galdon Aquino, Government of the Virgin Islands v. Ishmael Guillerma ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- United States v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Joseph KellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Edmond GiffordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. JosephDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1992