Legal Opinion

United States v. Edmond Gifford

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 17, 1990No. 88-1647PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Edmund Gifford appeals from a judgment of sentence following his conviction on charges stemming from a scheme to import phenyl-2-propanone (P2P), a chemical used to manufacture methamphetamine, into the United States. Gifford was convicted of one count of conspiracy to possess and manufacture methamphetamine and one count of attempted importation of P2P. Gifford raises two issues on appeal. First, he challenges the government’s use of at trial of videotaped depositions as a violation of his rights under the Confrontation Clause, the Due Process…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. Joseph KellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Mohamed Salim, A/K/A Abdul Qazi, A/K/A Mohamed AliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Albert Irvin Cates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Abu AliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  2. Stephen Christian, A/K/A Stephen Cline v. William RhodeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Joseph KellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael MEDJUCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API