Legal Opinion
Citibank (South Dakota) N. A. v. Ousterman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 18, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Cobb, J.), entered December 9, 1999 in Columbia County, which, inter alia, imposed sanctions against defendant’s counsel.
Plaintiff commenced this action against defendant to recover the sum of $8,479.98 allegedly owed under the terms of a credit card agreement. Defendant, represented by Andrew F. Capoccia Law Centers, L. L. C. (hereinafter Capoccia), served an answer generally denying the allegations of the complaint and asserting affirmative defenses and various discovery demands. Prior to responding to these demands, plaintiff moved for summary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Minister, Elders & Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. 198 Broadway, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- McCue v. McCueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Matter of Rose BB.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- First Deposit National Bank v. Van AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re Rose BB.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Polidori v. Societe Generale GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Matter of Gwenyth v. (Jennifer W.--McCarthy)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Pilatich v. Town of New BaltimoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019