Legal Opinion
Polidori v. Societe Generale Group
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 18, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Conduct of plaintiffs attorney warranting an award of costs includes, inter alia, her failure to appear at one court conference and her lateness at another, and obstreperous conduct at and premature termination of plaintiffs deposition (see O’Neill v Ho, 28 AD3d 626 [2006]; cf. Figdor v City of New York, 33 AD3d 560 [2006]). The notice requirements of part 130 were satisfied and a formal hearing was not required (see RCN Constr. Corp. v Fleet Bank, N.A., 34 AD3d 776, 777 [2006]; Citibank [S.D.] v Ousterman, 279 AD2d 886, 887 [2001]). The Special Referee’s occasional expressions of frustration…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Neill v. HoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- RCN Construction Corp. v. Fleet Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Figdor v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Citibank (South Dakota) N. A. v. OustermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- Daniel D. v. Linda C.New York City Family Court · 2009
- Gendell v. 42 W. 17th St. Hous. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Gendell v. 42 W. 17th St. Hous. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Bibi Khan-Soleil v. RashadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Bibi Khan-Soleil v. RashadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.