Legal Opinion
Matter of Rose BB.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided September 23, 1999PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Judge Ciparick taking no part.
2Cited by20 opinions
- Yenom Corp. v. 155 Wooster Street Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. HelligerNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Household Finance Corp. v. DynanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Estate of Rose BB.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Dallio v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.