Legal Opinion
State v. Person
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 10, 1973PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbraham J. Gellihoff, J.
This is a proceeding commenced by the Attorney-General pursuant to subdivision 12 of section 63 of the Executive Law, seeking an injunction and restitution.
Respondents operate a school for the training of paralegal personnel. In their advertising to prospective students, respondents represented that, upon completion of the course of study, graduates would ‘ ‘ earn a high salary starting at $9,000 or more per year.” In material sent to applicants, respondents repeated the prediction of starting salaries, and further stated: “ Paralegal Institute will refund 100% of your $700 tuition and $50…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. Bevis Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. Hotel Waldorf-Astoria Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. Ludwig Baumann & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ngan Gung Restaurant, Inc. v. New York (In Re Ngan Gung Restaurant, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- State v. Midland Equities of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. Network Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. Therapeutic Hypnosis, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1974