Legal Opinion

FLANDERS v. Hoy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 1974No. Appeal, 498PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

This appeal arises from the order of the lower court which sustained the preliminary objections of the defendant, Mrs. Hoy, and struck off the plaintiff’s complaint in trespass. The court thereupon entered judgment for the defendant. The facts of the case, which are not disputed, are as follows:

Mrs. Flanders, the plaintiff-appellant herein, and Mrs. Hoy both worked for the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDot) in its Cameron office. Mrs. Flanders, the chief clerk in that office, lived in the small community of Sinnemahoning approximately fifteen miles…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. APPLE v. ReichertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Konitch v. HartungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  3. Kramer v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. French v. Coff DecoratorsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Goodman v. University Shop, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fern v. UsslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. DeLong v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Turner Construction Co v. HebnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Guffey v. LoganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Yeagley v. Metropolitan Edison Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API