DeLong v. Miller
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellants contend that appellee is not entitled to summary judgment because he was not immune from suit pursuant to section 205 of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (the Act). 1 We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the order of the lower court.
The facts are not in dispute and may be stated as follows. Appellant Ernest T. DeLong and appellee Arthur Miller were both members and, consequently, employees 2 of a volunteer fire company in Hamburg. On March 15, 1979, in response to a fire alarm, Miller was driving his personal automobile to the fire house when he struck…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- APPLE v. ReichertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Foster v. State College BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Davis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Nelson v. Borough of GreenvilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Babich v. PavichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ducaji v. DennisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Blank v. ChawlaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Wells v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
- Estate of Soupene Ex Rel. Soupene v. LignitzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Albright v. FaganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.