Legal Opinion
Dime Savings & Trust Co. v. Humphreys
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 14, 1936No. 25056PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the lower court; that is, Dime Savings & Trust Bank, plaintiff in error, will be referred to as plaintiff, and J. M. Humphreys, defendant 'in error, will be referred to as defendant.
This action was filed April 7, 1930, on a note and to foreclose a mortgage securing the same, covering certain lands in Atoka county, Okla., executed by Amos Able and Dessie Able to Gum Bros. Company, dated January 24, 1920, due November 21, 1929, in the sum of $3,000, with interest at 6 per cent, per annum until due and 10 per cent, after maturity. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas, Tex. v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Monaghan & Murphy Bank v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Cushing v. CummingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Barnett v. Aetna Explosives Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Kimble v. BunnySupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wilson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Iola State Bank v. KisseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- City of Purcell v. Merco Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1971
- McGee v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Sanford P. Wilson and the Wilson Investment Company, a New Mexico Corporation v. C. P. Williams, Paul S. Williams, Rycade Oil Corporation, a Corporation, and Frank J. Branhisel, C. P. Williams and Cordelia Pearl Williams, of the Estate of Paul S. Williams, Deceased, Cross-Appellants v. Sanford P. Wilson and the Wilson Investment Company, a New Mexico Corporation Rycade Oil Corporation, a Corporation and Frank J. Barnhisel, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955