Legal Opinion

City of Purcell v. Merco Manufacturing, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 23, 1971No. 70-471PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

This controversy involves funds withheld by Plaintiff from its prime contractor as a- result of conflicting claims made thereon by the prime contractor, Aztec Construction Company (Aztec), and a supplier of materials, Merco Manufacturing, Inc. (Merco), used by Aztec in the performance of its contract with Plaintiff. Merco supplied the materials, consisting principally of structural steel, to Mac Steel, Inc. (Mac), which under a contract with Aztec performed various fabrication operations thereon before the steel was installed in the construction project by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. P. Bledsoe & Son v. W. B. Young Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Standard Accident Insurance v. BasoloSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Dime Savings & Trust Co. v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Standard Accident Insurance v. Deep Rock Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sparks Construction, Inc. v. Newman Brothers, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  2. Yellow Pine Lumber Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API