Legal Opinion

Finucane v. Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1990No. 499 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLINS, Judge.

Thomas Finucane (petitioner), individually and on behalf of all Pennsylvania milk consumers, petitions for review of the Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board’s (Board or respondent) order A-862, which created a bracket system in Milk Marketing Areas 3, 4, 5 and 6 under which the minimum price of milk products would change $.005 per gallon every time the cost of butterfat changes upward or downward $.06 per hundred weight. The order came about in response to the Pennsylvania Association of Milk Dealers’ (PAMD or intervenors) petition and the changes in federal policy as to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Spykerman v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Clark v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. LevinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Lily Penn Food Stores, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chichester School District v. Chichester Education Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Babac v. Pennsylvania Milk Marketing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Unified Sportsmen of Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Their Members v. Pennsylvania Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Quest Land Development Group, LLC v. Township of Lower HeidelbergCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Finucane v. Pennsylvania Milk Marketing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API