Treister v. Pacetty
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Justice.
The appellant, Arthur Treister, sought by his complaint in the court below to obtain specific performance of a contract for sale of realty between himself, as buyer, and the appellee, Mamie Pacetty, as seller. The answer by Pacetty simpy denied the agreement and without further pleading or proof, she filed motion for summary final decree. Affidavits by plaintiff and another, offered to sustain his bill, were not controverted by counter-affidavit or other evidence, and the facts appearing therefrom, to which the court was necessarily limited in granting summary decree for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kiekhoefer v. United States National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Deakin v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Forsyth v. DaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1856
- Morlet v. MausLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Tiger v. Button Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912