Legal Opinion

Morlet v. Maus

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 1936No. 16458PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Rehearing denied Nov. 16, 1936. Writ of certiorari refused December 21, 1936. The plaintiff, Jules E. Morlet, alleging that he is the holder and owner of 29 promissory notes aggregating $1,424, which he secured for value and before maturity from E.C. Toussel, the payee, brought this suit against Mrs. Julia E. Maus, widow of John W. Dauer, the maker. Mrs. Dauer defended on the ground that plaintiff was not a holder in due course of the notes sued on, for the reason that the indorsement of the payee on the back of the notes was a forgery, and averred that there was a failure of consideration…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coats v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  2. Vidrine v. DeshotelsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. Nugent v. HickeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
  4. Avery v. LauveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mathews v. New Mexico Light & Power Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Perdido Finance Company v. FalgoutLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Vermilion Bank & Trust Company v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Treister v. PacettySupreme Court of Florida · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API