Legal Opinion

Newman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1985No. 14242PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Movant appeals from the dismissal of his second motion under Rule 27.26. Movant was convicted of murder in the first degree and the conviction was affirmed on appeal. See State v. Newman, 605 S.W.2d 781 (Mo.1980). He then filed a motion under Rule 27.26. That motion was denied by the trial court and affirmed on appeal. See Newman v. State, 669 S.W.2d 617 (Mo.App.1984).

Thereafter, movant filed another motion under Rule 27.26, alleging that the information on which he was tried was defective. The motion alleged that movant did not know of the error in the information until…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Howard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Brauch v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Crews v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Holloway v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Rainbolt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Sours v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API