Legal Opinion
National Leased Housing Ass'n v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 17, 1995No. Nos. 6-87C, 324-87C, 204-88C and 6-90CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDEWELT, Judge.
I
In these consolidated actions, plaintiffs, National Leased Housing Association and other present or former owners of rental housing projects, seek back-rent payments from the United States under Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) contracts that plaintiffs entered with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The HAP contracts cover housing units that plaintiffs rented to low-income families pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f. Plaintiffs contend that HUD calculated the annual rent adjustments due…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Howard Smithson and Maretta Smithson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Leased Housing Association, and 189 Named v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Kennedy Heights Apartments, Ltd. I v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Haddon Housing Associates, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Speers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.