American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Bennett, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of the court:
Plaintiffs bring this claim for breach of contract and invoke our general jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1491. Plaintiffs are operators of ships and have contracts with defendant, now represented by the Maritime Administration, Department of Commerce (MAKAD).1 Pursuant to the Merchant Marine Act of 1986, section 603(b),2 the contracts provide for operating-differential subsidies (CDS) to reimburse the plaintiff contractors for part of the “fair and reasonable cost *430of * * * wages * * * of officers and crews.”3 The purpose of the subsidies is to put…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Puerto Rico v. Shell Co. (PR), Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- In Re the Arbitration Between National Cash Register Co. & WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Safir v. United States Lines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Safir v. United States Lines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Prudential Lines, Inc. v. United States Maritime Administration (In Re Prudential Lines, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Blaha v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Julius Goldman's Egg City v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.