Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pleasant v. City of Ottawa

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 1911No. 16,866PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Franklin district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was brought to oust the city from exercising the power and franchise of requiring the engineers and firemen at the city water and light plant to work more than eight hours per day. Find*101ings of fact and conclusions of law were stated separately, and those which are now material follow:

“FINDINGS OF FACT.
“(4) It-is necessary in the operation of this plant that one of the pumps be operated continuously, and for the last two years the plan has been to operate one pump ■ continuously for about two weeks, and then the other for the same…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Ives v. MartindaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. YatesArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Harris v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  3. Devney's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. McQuiston v. Sun CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. State v. BuntingOregon Supreme Court · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API