State ex rel. Ives v. Martindale
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original Proceeding in Mandamus. Application for a writ of mandamus to compel the directors and warden of the state penitentiary to comply with the eight-hour law.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This is an original proceeding in this court, brought by the state npon the relation of the attorney general, against the directors and warden of the state penitentiary, praying that they be compelled to comply with the provisions of chapter 114 of the Session Laws of 1891, commonly called “the eight-hour law,” in the employment and control of officers and employés working in the state penitentiary. It appears from the stipulation of the parties that several of the officers and other employés in the penitentiary are required and permitted…
2Cited by7 opinions
- City of Topeka v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- State v. BlaserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- State ex rel. Pleasant v. City of OttawaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- In re AshbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Farrell v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.