Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Consolidated Edison Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 14, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenberger, J. P.
This case presents an issue of first impression: whether Administrative Code of the City of New York § 24-521 (b), which requires public utilities to bear the costs of protecting utility installations affected by public construction projects, overrides the common-law rule that the City must bear such “interference costs” when the utility installations are maintained pursuant to permanent easements purchased by the utility company from a private landowner, rather than pursuant to a franchise from the City. We must also decide whether, *191under the facts of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- MTR. OF CONS. EDISON CO. v. LindsayNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DeMicco Bros. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- City of New York v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- City of New York v. Verizon New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- City of New York v. Verizon New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004