Legal Opinion
Escamilla v. Nuyen
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 4, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-0852PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALAN KAY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff José Milton Bautista Escamilla (“Plaintiff’ or “Mr. Escamilla”) seeks partial Summary Judgment against Defendants David Nuyen d/b/a USA Home Champion Realty and d/b/a Opmax (“Mr. Nuyen”), USA Home Champion Realty, Inc. (“Home Champion Realty”), Opmax Management, LLC (“Opmax Mgmt.”), and Opmax, LLC (“Opmax”) (collectively, “Defendants”). (See Mot. for Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion”) [26].) Plaintiff and Defendants consented to a referral of the case to this Court for all purposes, including trial. (Order of Referral [11].)…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Orellana v. NBSB Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Winmar Construction, Inc. v. KasemirDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Andrade Romero v. Rbs Construction Corporation, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Johnson v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Orellana v. Nbsb Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.