Legal Opinion

Taylor v. City of Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 3, 1989No. 68409Published

1Opinion of the Court

782 P.2d 1363 (1989)

Jimmy L. TAYLOR, Petitioner,

v.

CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, Own Risk, and Workers' Compensation Court, Respondents.

No. 68409.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

October 3, 1989.

Sidney A. Musser, Jr., Abel, Musser, Sokolosky and Clark, Oklahoma City, for petitioner.

Rose M. Sloan, Oldfield and Coker, Oklahoma City, for respondents.

SIMMS, Justice:

Proceedings to review an order of the Worker's Compensation Court three-judge panel denying recovery under a motion to reopen a claim for change of condition as not timely filed. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded with instructions. We VACATE…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Taylor v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Shank v. Oklahoma Office & Bank Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Hadley v. American General Life Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API