Legal Opinion

Doe v. Fenix International Limited

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided January 29, 2025No. 0:22-cv-62176Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 22-cv-62176-ALTMAN/Strauss JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. FENIX INTERNATIONAL, LTD., et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ ORDER The facts of this case are harrowing. Our Plaintiff, Jane Doe, alleges that the Defendants, Michelson Romelus and Bendjy Charles, “filmed each other on video while they forcibly raped and sodomized [her].” Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) [ECF No. 63] ¶ 14. This would have been horrible enough, but the indignity was compounded weeks later when Romelus “edited and uploaded the video…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API