Doe v. Fenix International Limited
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 22-cv-62176-ALTMAN/Strauss JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. FENIX INTERNATIONAL, LTD., et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ ORDER The facts of this case are harrowing. Our Plaintiff, Jane Doe, alleges that the Defendants, Michelson Romelus and Bendjy Charles, “filmed each other on video while they forcibly raped and sodomized [her].” Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) [ECF No. 63] ¶ 14. This would have been horrible enough, but the indignity was compounded weeks later when Romelus “edited and uploaded the video…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.