Delgadillo v. Woodford
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
This appeal requires us to consider whether for purposes of our review under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1), a state habeas court’s decision to apply Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), retroactively to uphold a defendant’s sentence is an unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent. Although Whorton v. Bockting, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1173, 1177, 167 L.Ed.2d 1 (2007), held that Crawford is not retroactively applicable in federal habeas proceedings, Danforth v. Minnesota, —…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by199 opinions
- Gregory Dickens v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Boyer v. BellequeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Strayhorn v. BookerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Paul Browning v. Renee BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Nelson Hernandez v. Kim HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.