Legal Opinion
Aaron Reynoso v. George J. Giurbino, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 6, 2006No. 05-55695PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
The State, through Warden Giurbino, appeals the district court’s decision to grant Aaron Reynoso’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. It asserts that the claim on which relief was granted was unex-hausted and that the state court’s rejection of the claim was reasonable. We conclude that Reynoso’s claim was properly exhausted and that, on the merits, he has demonstrated ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). We agree with the district court that the state court’s decision to the contrary…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Stanley v. CullenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Miriam Mendiola-Martinez v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Runningeagle v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. MunozCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Cary Williams v. Timothy FilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.