H. Donald Ratliff, Frank H. Cullen, and John J. Jarvis v. Davis Polk & Wardwell, Baan Company, N v. Amal M. Johnson, Jaan Baan and Tom Tinsley
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WESLEY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion to compel non-party appellee Davis Polk & Wardwell (“Davis Polk”) — a New York law firm — to comply with a subpoena to produce non-privileged documents in its possession. The documents belong to a Dutch firm, Ernst & Young Accountants (“E & Y”), and came under Davis Polk’s control during its representation of E & Y in connection with a now-resolved Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) investigation. The district court denied plaintiffs’ motion to compel, relying solely on this Court’s decision, In…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RajaratnamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Kiobel v. Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Robbins & Myers, Inc. v. J.M. Huber Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Doe v. HochulCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
- Riyad Darwich Mustafa Abu Hasirah v. The Department of Homeland Security, F/k/a the United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.