Legal Opinion
General Motors Corporation v. Blackmore
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 10, 1931No. 5709PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
Appellees recovered a judgment in the District Court in an action at law founded upon Rev. St. § 4919 (title 35, U. S. C. § 67 [35 USCA § 67]), for the infringement of patent to Pearson, No. 855970, on side curtain supports for vehicles (the now familiar curtain rod for automobile touring ears). Eifty-six errors are assigned, but in many instances these may be grouped for consideration, since the main contentions of appellant, defendant below, are presented under a variety of exceptions: To the admission of evidence, to the charge, to refusals to charge, etc. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lámar v. GrangerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. E. W. Bliss Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Activated Sludge v. Sanitary Dist. of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
- Trio Process Corporation and Franklin Smelting & Refining Co., a Partnership v. L. Goldstein's Sons, Inc. And Metal Bank, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- General Motors Corporation v. DaileyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.