Legal Opinion
Harold v. Richards
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 25, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-115PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rufe, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a proposed class action on behalf of Pennsylvania residents whose driver's licenses are suspended upon conviction of any offense involving controlled substances, under Pennsylvania law, federal, law, or the law of any other state, regardless of whether the offense involved a vehicle or traffic safety.1 Defendants, sued in their official capacities, are the governor of Pennsylvania and officials of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation ("PennDOT"), which has the exclusive authority to suspend or revoke driver's licenses.
Plaintiffs allege that…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Associated Builders & Contractors, E. Pa. Chapter, Inc. v. Cnty. of NorthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- THE MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY, INC. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021