Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Texas Gulf, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 30, 1986No. 863SC410PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

The sole issue before the Court is whether the plaintiffs complaint should have been dismissed because it conclusively showed plaintiff to be an employee of defendant at the time he was injured and thereby limited his remedy to recovery under the Workers’ Compensation Act. We conclude that the trial court erred in dismissing the case.

N.C.G.S. § 97-10.1 provides that if an employee and employer are subject to and have complied with the Workers’ Compensation Act, the rights and remedies granted to the employee under the Act are his sole remedy and exclude all other rights and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Lloyd v. BabbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Collins v. James Paul Edwards, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ghersi v. SalazarUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hughart v. Dasco Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Whicker v. Compass Group USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Murrow v. HensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Lassiter v. Robeson Cnty. Sheriff's Dep'tSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API