Legal Opinion

Murrow v. Henson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 16, 2005No. COA04-1558PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Plaintiffs Joanne H. Murrow and Rebecca H. Mathis appeal the order of the trial court dismissing their claim that defendants Nancy Henson and Bonnie Gallo maliciously caused their step-grandmother to execute a will that left plaintiffs only nominal be quests. We hold that plaintiffs’ complaint sufficiently states a claim for relief under Johnson v. Stevenson, 269 N.C. 200, 152 S.E.2d 214 (1967) and Griffin v. Baucom, 74 N.C. App. 282, 328 S.E.2d 38, disc. review denied, 314 N.C. 115, 332 S.E.2d 481 (1985) and, therefore, reverse the decision below.

Facts

Plaintiffs and defendants…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Sterner v. PennCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Bohannon v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Briggs (In re Certification of Court)South Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Briggs v. BriggsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Wilder v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Finks v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Finks v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API