Janice Doty Unlimited, Inc. v. Stoecker
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
This diversity case arises out of a contract between plaintiff Janice Doty Unlimited, d/b/a Nannys Unlimited (“Nannys”) and defendants William J. and Grace M. Stoecker (“Stoeckers”) for the placement and services of a domestic professional. The Stoeckers have filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 1 For the reasons set forth below, we deny that motion.
Facts 2
Nannys is a Georgia Corporation which specializes in placing domestic and child care help on a nationwide basis. In October 1986, Nannys…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richard P. Rita Personnel Services International, Inc. v. KotSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Durham v. Stand-By Labor of Georgia, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Singer v. Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, P.C.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Orkin Exterminating Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Uni-Worth Enterprises, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Borg-Warner Protective Services Corp. v. Guardsmark, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1996
- Janice Doty Unlimited, Inc. v. StoeckerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988