Legal Opinion

Janice Doty Unlimited, Inc. v. Stoecker

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 6, 1988No. 87 C 9871PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

This diversity case arises out of a contract between plaintiff Janice Doty Unlimited, d/b/a Nannys Unlimited (“Nannys”) and defendants William J. and Grace M. Stoecker (“Stoeckers”) for the placement and services of a domestic professional. The Stoeckers have filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 1 For the reasons set forth below, we deny that motion.

Facts 2

Nannys is a Georgia Corporation which specializes in placing domestic and child care help on a nationwide basis. In October 1986, Nannys…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Richard P. Rita Personnel Services International, Inc. v. KotSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  2. Durham v. Stand-By Labor of Georgia, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  3. Singer v. Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, P.C.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  5. Uni-Worth Enterprises, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Borg-Warner Protective Services Corp. v. Guardsmark, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1996
  2. Janice Doty Unlimited, Inc. v. StoeckerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API