Legal Opinion
Borg-Warner Protective Services Corp. v. Guardsmark, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided November 27, 1996No. Civil Action 94-169, 95-124PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BERTELSMAN, Chief Judge;
This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment (docs. #161 and #193 in 94-169 and docs. #57 and #83 in 95-124), After conducting oral arguments and reviewing supplemental briefs, it is determined that summary judgment should be entered in favor of the defendant on all claims.
BACKGROUND
Guardsmark and Borg-Warner are competitors in the private security guard industry. The parties agree that there are over 13,000 private security guard firms in this country. Guardsmark is the fifth largest of these, and Borg-Warner is even larger…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- John F. BELLAMY, Jr., Appellant, v. MASON’S STORES, INC., (RICHMOND), and A. Friedman, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Denny's Marina, Incorporated v. Renfro Productions, Incorporated Indianapolis Boat, Sport and Travel Show, Incorporated Maxine J. RenfroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Morton Buildings of Nebraska, Inc. v. Morton Buildings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Motive Parts Warehouse v. Facet EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Managed Health Care Associates, Inc. v. KethanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Lazer Spot, Inc. v. Hiring Partners, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
- Allen, Gibbs & Houlik, L.C. v. RistowCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
- Prithvi Catalytic, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. (In re Prithvi Catalytic, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- AWP, Inc. v. Safe Zone Services, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.