Legal Opinion

Tennen v. Lane

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 18, 1985No. 2 CA-CIV 5480PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is from a directed verdict against the plaintiff, Harriet Tennen, in a legal malpractice claim against the defendant, Robert L. Lane, an attorney practicing in Phoenix. The verdict was directed because the trial court found, as a matter of law, that no evidence showed that the malpractice, if any, was a proximate cause of any damage to the plaintiff. The obvious issue on appeal is whether this finding was error. We reverse.

The facts giving rise to the appellant’s claim, viewed in the most favorable manner to her, follow. The appellant was married…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Blue Water Corp., Inc. v. O'TOOLESupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Brand v. JH Rose Trucking CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Santanello v. CooperArizona Supreme Court · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & StrawnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Cecala v. NewmanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
  4. Estate of Aten v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. DeSilva v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API