Legal Opinion

City of Newport v. Hiland Dairy Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 16, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Cammack

— Reversing.

In February of this year, tbe City of Newport passed a milk control and regulation ordinance, generally referred to as the “Grade A” Milk Ordinance. The appellees, milk distributors in the City, instituted this proceeding early in March to test the validity of certain sections of the Ordinance and to enjoin the City from enforcing it. The trial court filed an “Opinion and Judgment Order” on April 20th, finally disposing of the case. Since there appears to be some difference of opinion as to the effect of the “Judgment Order,” we will review it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. City of Norfolk v. FlynnSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  3. Korth v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Pure Milk Producers & Distributors Ass'ns v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  5. Hill v. FetherolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Producers Ass'n of San Antonio v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Felt v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  3. Terry Dairy Products Co. v. Beard, City CollectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  4. Felt v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API