Legal Opinion
Michael Long v. Liquor Control Commission
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 16, 2017No. 335723PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
*63 In this inverse-condemnation action, the trial court granted summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8) to defendant, the Liquor Control Commission (the LCC) and denied plaintiff, Michael Long's motion to amend his complaint. Plaintiff now appeals as of right. Because plaintiff failed to state a claim for inverse condemnation and amendment of his complaint would be futile, we affirm.
Plaintiff owns and operates a liquor store, known as Par-T-Pac, in Boyne City, Michigan. Since 1990, he has held a specially designated distributor (SDD) license, *677 which allows him to sell alcohol 1 for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Bundo v. City of Walled LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Marilyn Froling Revocable Living Trust v. Bloomfield Hills Country ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re Stillwell TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Christopher E Kazor Dds Ms Phd v. LaraMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Donald L Harkins v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Grant Bauserman v. Unemployment Insurance AgencyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Hastings Dog Park Companions v. City of HastingsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- James P Page v. City of WyandotteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.