Legal Opinion

Vanguard Insurance v. Clarke

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1989No. Docket 110598PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

Defendant Melinda Clarke appeals as of right from an order of the trial court granting plaintiffs motion for summary disposition on its complaint for declaratory judgment. The lower court determined that the homeowner’s insurance policy issued by plaintiff did not provide coverage requiring plaintiff to either defend or indemnify the estate of William Gary Logan Clarke for the claims brought by Melinda Clarke in an underlying lawsuit which alleged negligence against her father for the deaths of her mother and brother. We reverse the trial court’s order and hold that plaintiff does have a duty…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Detroit Edison Co. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vanguard Insurance v. ClarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Tri-State Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. BollingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Lepp v. Cheboygan Area SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. SALEM GROUP, FARMERS MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO. v. OliverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  5. Auto-Owners Insurance v. Titan Indemnity Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API