Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 29, 2016No. 2634/15PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Moylan, J.

The key to our resolution of this State appeal was sounded 82 years ago by Supreme Court Justice Benjamin Nathan Cardozo:

“[Jjustice, though due to the accused, is due to the accuser also. The concept of fairness must not be strained till it is narrowed to a filament. We are to keep the balance true.”

Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97, 122, 54 S.Ct. 330, 78 L.Ed. 674 (1934).

The Playing Field is Level

As we seek to answer Justice Cardozo’s call “to keep the balance true,” our attention turns in the case now before us to the contractual integrity of plea agreements. A plea…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Sweetwine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Cuffley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Hughes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  4. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. PorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API