Legal Opinion

Champagne v. Champagne

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1927No. 20206. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Appellant brought this action as plaintiff to foreclose a chattel mortgage on one Sterling three and one-half ton truck, equipped with a steel body and an hydraulic self dump, described as the car formerly owned by one J. H. Haney of Spokane, from whom the mortgagor purchased it, together with other property.

It appears that the mortgage was given to secure a note for $585, dated September 17,1924, due ninety days after date, the note being payable to one Charles M. Chamberlain, to whom also the mortgage ran. The note and mortgage were assigned by Chamberlain to the appellant before maturity…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flynn v. Garford Motor Truck Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Northwestern Finance Co. v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. QUEIROZ v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Creditors Claim & Adjustment Co. v. First Seattle Dexter Horton National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API