Legal Opinion
Flynn v. Garford Motor Truck Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 8, 1928No. 21286. Department TwoPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action for the purpose of recovering damages from defendant for the alleged conversion of a motor truck chassis. This chassis or truck was, prior to January 1, 1926, sold for cash by defendant, the agent for the Garford Motor Trucks in Seattle, to one C. W. Ludolph, a dealer in automobiles, having his place of business in the city of Spokane.
On February 26, 1926, Ludolph sold this truck by contract of conditional sale to the plaintiff, and assigned the contract of sale and conveyed title to the truck, subject to the contract, to one Frank D. Stoop. The contract of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Bank v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Howard v. ShawWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- West American Finance Co. v. FinstadWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Bank of California v. DanamillerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Fischer v. WoodruffWashington Supreme Court · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Munz v. National Bond Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KlineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Northwestern Finance Co. v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- General Credit Corp. v. KapunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Automotive Collateral Co. v. BeckmanWashington Supreme Court · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.