20th Century Insurance v. Tak Hung Choong
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
In this case we hold an attorney-employer has standing to appeal a monetary sanction imposed on an attorney-employee. We also hold imposing a monetary sanction for not paying a previous monetary sanction was not an abuse of discretion.
Facts and Proceedings Below
At a mandatory settlement conference, the trial court imposed a sanction in the amount of $200 on plaintiff’s attorney, Richard Collins, for failure to prepare a mandatory settlement conference statement. (Super. Ct. L.A. County, Local Rules, rule 7.9(b)(6).) The court’s order provided the sanction would be set aside…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Moyal v. LanphearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Caldwell v. Samuels JewelersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. TabbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Calhoun v. Vallejo City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mardirossian & Associates, Inc. v. ErsoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Sampson v. Parking Service 2000 Com., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Palm Valley Homeowners Ass'n v. Design MTCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Franceschi v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Jackson v. Chevron U.S.A. CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2015