Legal Opinion

Conlin v. Coyne

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1936No. Civ. 10796PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DESMOND, J., pro tem.

Respondent moved to dismiss an appeal from an order of the superior court denying a new trial, claiming that such an order is not appealable, under section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which lists the cases in which an appeal may be taken. Prior to 1915, by the terms of that section, an order refusing, as well as an order granting, a new trial was appealable. The legislature in that year struck out the words “or refusing” before “a new trial” (Stats. 1915, p. 209), but at the same session recast section 956 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the form now in effect…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilcox v. HardistyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Conlin v. CoyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Fickett v. RauchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Weisbecker v. WeisbeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Weinstein v. E. F. Hutton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Williams v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API