Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Hardisty

California Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1918No. Sac. No. 2814PublishedCited by 11 opinions

MOTION to dismiss an appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment and an order denying a new trial, on the ground, as to the appeal from the judgment, that the appeal was taken too late, and as to the order denying a motion for a new trial, that the same is not an appealable order.

The order denying a new trial was made December 1, 1917, and in view of the law as it then existed, it must be held that no appeal lay therefrom. (Woodruff v. Colyear, 172 Cal. 440, [156 Pac. 475].)

As to the appeal from the judgment: The judgment was entered April 27, 1911. The appeal therefrom was not taken until December 21,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woodruff v. ColyearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Lambert v. KampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Boole v. Union Marine Ins. Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Moore v. Ojai Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Conlin v. CoyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API