Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sorensen v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1933No. 28609PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is an action to establish a preferred claim with the receiver of the Farmers & Merchants State Bank of McCook, in the sum of $2,700, by reason of a deposit to the credit of the intervener, L. H. Cheney, referee in partition.

In June, 1931, L. H. Cheney, a practicing attorney at McCook, was appointed referee in partition by the district court in the case of Harsch v. Harsch. He filed his report, showing that the real estate could not be partitioned, which report was approved by the court, and he was' directed to sell the property. The district court fixed the amount of his bond for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Capital National Bank v. Coldwater National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hudspeth v. Union Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Blythe v. KujawaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Bank of Crab Orchard v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State ex rel. Sorensen v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sorensen v. American State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Citizens State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API