Bank of Crab Orchard v. Myers
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
This is an action on promissory notes. Defendant admitted the -execution of the notes and the indebtedness thereby evidenced, and alleged that he was entitled to a set-off by reason of a deposit he had made in the Bank of Crab Orchard in his capacity as an administrator. The trial court allowed the set-off and rendered judgment for plaintiff for the excess above the set-off. Plaintiff has appealed.
Without conflict the record shows the following facts: Prior to the 15th of August, 1928, defendant was indebted to the Bank of Crab Orchard on several promissory notes, aggregating more than…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Officer v. OfficerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Stadler v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Proctor v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Simpson v. JenningsNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Citizens State Bank v. WordenNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Urias v. PCS Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Davis Erection Co., Inc. v. JorgensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- American Gas Construction Co. v. LiscoNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Ben B. Wood Realty Co. v. WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- Weller v. PutnamNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.