Legal Opinion

Bank of Crab Orchard v. Myers

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1930No. 27304PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action on promissory notes. Defendant admitted the -execution of the notes and the indebtedness thereby evidenced, and alleged that he was entitled to a set-off by reason of a deposit he had made in the Bank of Crab Orchard in his capacity as an administrator. The trial court allowed the set-off and rendered judgment for plaintiff for the excess above the set-off. Plaintiff has appealed.

Without conflict the record shows the following facts: Prior to the 15th of August, 1928, defendant was indebted to the Bank of Crab Orchard on several promissory notes, aggregating more than…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Officer v. OfficerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Stadler v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Proctor v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Simpson v. JenningsNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Citizens State Bank v. WordenNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Urias v. PCS Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. Davis Erection Co., Inc. v. JorgensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. American Gas Construction Co. v. LiscoNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Ben B. Wood Realty Co. v. WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Weller v. PutnamNebraska Supreme Court · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API