Lochridge v. City of Winston-Salem
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER and JUDGMENT
OSTEEN, District Judge.
In this Standing Order 30 proceeding, the Magistrate Judge has recommended that the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted. The Plaintiff timely filed objections to the recommendation and Defendant timely responded.
This court has conducted a review of the file and has determined that the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is appropriate and should be adopted.
For the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation of August 5, 2005, this court overrules the objections filed by the Plaintiff and the Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Wiggins v. DaVita Tidewater, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
- Kothe v. Continental Teves, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2006
- BRISSON v. SALISBURY HOUSING AUTHORITYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.