Mitchell Partners, L.P. v. Irex Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.
We accepted certification from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit to address the exclusiveness of a statutory appraisal remedy provided, under Pennsylvania corporate law, to minority shareholders in certain merger scenarios.
Per Pennsylvania’s Business Corporation Law,1 a shareholder of a domestic business corporation may have prescribed entitlements — termed “dissenter’s rights” — upon the shareholder’s objection to the corporation’s participation in a merger (or some other transactions entailing fundamental corporate changes). See 15 Pa.C.S. §…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Cathedral Estates, Inc. v. The Taft Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- In Re Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- In Re Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schanne, R., Aplt. v. Addis, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Osprey Portfolio, LLC v. IzettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Shelly Funeral Home, Inc. v. Warrington TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Wayne M. Chiurazzi Law Inc. v. MRO Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Colorcon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.