Andersen v. Long Island Railroad
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The factual and procedural background out of which this appeal arises is set forth in the opinion at the Appellate Division (88 AD2d 328).
The 1976 amendment to section 1276 of the Public Authorities Law did not abolish the requirement that there be presented a demand to be followed by a 30-day waiting period prior to the institution of an action such as the present. Before that amendment, subdivisions 1, 2 and 6 provided as follows:
*660“Actions against the authority.
“1. As a condition to the consent…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Andersen v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Niemczyk v. PawlakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by30 opinions
- Burgess v. Long Island Railroad AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Allen v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 20Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Adams v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Rose v. Metro North Commuter RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Penner v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.