Legal Opinion

Niemczyk v. Pawlak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1980PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Cardamone, J.

We are asked to interpret the time limitations contained in section 1299-p of the Public Authorities Law. That section, in general, provides that "[a]s a condition to the consent of the state to * * * suits against the authority * * * the complaint shall contain an allegation that at least thirty days have elapsed since the demand, claim or claims upon which such action is founded were presented * * * and the authority has * * * refused * * * payment thereof’ (Public Authorities Law, § 1299-p, subd 1). Subdivision 2 of the same section contains a one-year…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. LyonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. Yawn v. Regional Transit ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Renwick v. Town of AlleganyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ott v. BarashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Andersen v. Long Island RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Andersen v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Albano v. HawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Vail v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API