Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Long Island Railroad Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1991PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff was injured on the tracks of the Long Island Railroad (LIRR) after discharge from a LIRR train. He did not serve a summons and complaint on the public authority until more than one year and 30 days after his claim accrued. Therefore, his claim was untimely and correctly dismissed.

A person has one year from the date a claim accrues to commence an action against a public authority such as LIRR (Public Authorities Law § 1276 [2]). The complaint must contain an allegation that at least 30…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barchet v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Andersen v. Long Island RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Colby v. Columbia CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Mayayev v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority BusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Cruz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Hall-Kimbrell Environmental Services, Inc. v. East Ramapo Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Jacobs v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API