Legal Opinion

State v. Knepper

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 13, 1983No. M200431; CA A25872PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Defendant was convicted of driving while under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 487.540. He contends that it was error to permit the state’s expert witness to disclose to the jury excludable evidence that formed the basis of the expert’s opinion. OEC 703. He also assigns error to an instruction concerning blood-alcohol content, ORS 487.540(1)(a), and the state concedes that the instruction constituted error. We reverse.

A chemical test of defendant’s blood indicated an alcohol content of 0.24 percent. The test result was excluda-ble under the implied consent law, ORS 487.835, and it was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FogleOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State v. StoverOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Stevens v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Mission Insurance v. Wallace Security Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. State v. ProseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API